About Me

Name: Chuck Rickard
Location: Baltimore, MD
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

FEMA: Friend, Foe, or Tyrannical Tool! Part 3, The End?

As you saw in my first article, FEMA is not what it appears to be. This can be said with most rules, regulations, and laws that come out of Washington (and most state capitals). Human greed and the quest for power are endless.

I first learned of this in the late seventies and called Maryland Senator Paul Sarbanes’ office for copies of all the pertinent Executive Orders. After a few weeks they provided everything.  It didn’t take long to see what was behind all of this preparedness.

I don’t know if the Presidents involved completely understood the implications. I doubt it or they may never have signed off on them. Some staffers probably worked on it and they just signed it thinking they were doing the right thing. Maybe no one did it intentionally. That we will never know.

However, the point of fact is, it is a dangerous and tyrannically system if used by the wrong person(s).

This and other bits and pieces of knowledge that I accumulated over the years led me to believe there would be a time when we had the chance of a drastic change in our government, and FEMA might just led the way. I figured it might be in the nineties but it didn’t happen.

Ronald Reagan was too much of a patriot and had little time or energy for a power grab. George Bush I, though a liar and fairly incompetent, was the same. Bill Clinton was just a social guy looking for a good time, a name in history, and the percs of office. No matter what you think of him, George Bush II was a patriot without the ambition of power.

When Alexander Haig was a well known name, I had my fears he would be the one. He tried to take over the government when Reagan was shot, though he had no legal right to do so. It was rumored that the explosion in his NATO caravan was just a ploy to get his name in the news. Who knows? Regardless, thankfully he faded into to history and never became a serious candidate for President.

In addition to the Orders I listed and the rulings of the Supreme Court, something extremely disturbing happened in 2007. That was the basic repeal of the Posse Comitatus Act.

“The Posse Comitatus Act is a United States federal law (18 U.S.C. § 1385) passed on June 16, 1878 after the end of Reconstruction, with the intention (in concert with the Insurrection Act of 1807) of substantially limiting the powers of the federal government to use the military for law enforcement. The Act prohibits most members of the federal uniformed services (today the Army, Air Force, and State National Guard forces when such are called into federal service) from exercising nominally state law enforcement, police, or peace officer powers that maintain "law and order" on non-federal property (states and their counties and municipal divisions) within the United States.

The statute generally prohibits federal military personnel and units of the National Guard under federal authority from acting in a law enforcement capacity within the United States, except where expressly authorized by the Constitution or Congress. The Coast Guard is exempt from the Act.” (Wikipedia)

Public Law 109-364, the "John Warner Defense Authorization Act of 2007" (H.R.5122) basically overrides Posse Comitatus and allows use of the military inside the borders of the U.S. One section has a very dire and foreboding change. “(It) specifies situations in which the President can invoke martial law (natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health emergency, terrorist attack or incident or other condition in which the President determines that domestic violence has occurred to the extent that state officials cannot maintain public order). These had not been specified before.” (BORDC) You can read all of the highlights at Bill of Rights Defense Committee's Report.

With the ability to declare martial law combined with the FEMA Orders, we have the absolute possibility of an unstable and uncertain future with the right person at the helm.

Next Time in Part III, I will discuss what is happening now.

As always, be prepared,

Chuck



Copyright Crickard Publishing 2009. All rights Reserved

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

FEMA: Friend, Foe, or Tyrannical Tool! Part 2

As you saw in my first article, FEMA is not what it appears to be. This can be said with most rules, regulations, and laws that come out of Washington (and most state capitals). Human greed and the quest for power are endless.

I first learned of this in the late seventies and called Maryland Senator Paul Sarbanes’ office for copies of all the pertinent Executive Orders. After a few weeks they provided everything.  It didn’t take long to see what was behind all of this preparedness.

I don’t know if the Presidents involved completely understood the implications. I doubt it or they may never have signed off on them. Some staffers probably worked on it and they just signed it thinking they were doing the right thing. Maybe no one did it intentionally. That we will never know.

However, the point of fact is, it is a dangerous and tyrannically system if used by the wrong person(s).

This and other bits and pieces of knowledge that I accumulated over the years led me to believe there would be a time when we had the chance of a drastic change in our government, and FEMA might just led the way. I figured it might be in the nineties but it didn’t happen.

Ronald Reagan was too much of a patriot and had little time or energy for a power grab. George Bush I, though a liar and fairly incompetent, was the same. Bill Clinton was just a social guy looking for a good time, a name in history, and the percs of office. No matter what you think of him, George Bush II was a patriot without the ambition of power.

When Alexander Haig was a well known name, I had my fears he would be the one. He tried to take over the government when Reagan was shot, though he had no legal right to do so. It was rumored that the explosion in his NATO caravan was just a ploy to get his name in the news. Who knows? Regardless, thankfully he faded into to history and never became a serious candidate for President.

In addition to the Orders I listed and the rulings of the Supreme Court, something extremely disturbing happened in 2007. That was the basic repeal of the Posse Comitatus Act.

“The Posse Comitatus Act is a United States federal law (18 U.S.C. § 1385) passed on June 16, 1878 after the end of Reconstruction, with the intention (in concert with the Insurrection Act of 1807) of substantially limiting the powers of the federal government to use the military for law enforcement. The Act prohibits most members of the federal uniformed services (today the Army, Air Force, and State National Guard forces when such are called into federal service) from exercising nominally state law enforcement, police, or peace officer powers that maintain "law and order" on non-federal property (states and their counties and municipal divisions) within the United States.

The statute generally prohibits federal military personnel and units of the National Guard under federal authority from acting in a law enforcement capacity within the United States, except where expressly authorized by the Constitution or Congress. The Coast Guard is exempt from the Act.” (Wikipedia)

Public Law 109-364, the "John Warner Defense Authorization Act of 2007" (H.R.5122) basically overrides Posse Comitatus and allows use of the military inside the borders of the U.S. One section has a very dire and foreboding change. “(It) specifies situations in which the President can invoke martial law (natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health emergency, terrorist attack or incident or other condition in which the President determines that domestic violence has occurred to the extent that state officials cannot maintain public order). These had not been specified before.” (BORDC) You can read all of the highlights at Bill of Rights Defense Committee's Report.

With the ability to declare martial law combined with the FEMA Orders, we have the absolute possibility of an unstable and uncertain future with the right person at the helm.

Next Time in Part III, I will discuss what is happening now.

As always, be prepared,

Chuck



Copyright Crickard Publishing 2009. All rights Reserved

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

FEMA: Friend, Foe, or Tyrannical Tool! Part 1

It would seem natural that all governments would want to protect their people in times of disaster, both natural and man-made (though not all do). Contingencies may be set up for such events. The United States is no exception. But as with all good intentions the pathway to oblivion is only a short change of course.

Very few citizens had ever heard of FEMA before hurricanes Andrew & Katrina, most have no idea of its origin, abilities, and true purpose. I will set a lot of it out for you in these articles, but you must follow the links and read the official government documents for yourself.

This is not to add to your fear but to your preparedness. As with most things governmental, citizen vigilance is absolutely necessary.

For clarification: An executive order is a proclamation by the President of the United States without the input or action of the congress or senate. It is the law.

It all started simply enough in 1962 with Executive Order EO 10990 ostensibly to re-establish the National Safety Council: true purpose, to take over all modes of transportation and control of highways and seaport in case of an emergency.

That was followed by these:

EO 10995: allows the government to seize and control the communication media.

EO 10997: allows the government to take over all electrical power, gas, petroleum, fuels and minerals.

EO 10998: allows the government to take over all food resources and farms.

EO 11000: allows the government to mobilize civilians into work brigades under government supervision.

EO 11001: allows the government to take over all health, education and welfare functions.

EO 11002: designates the Postmaster General to operate a national registration of all persons.

EO 11003: allows the government to take over all airports and aircraft, including commercial aircraft.

EO 11004: allows the Housing and Finance Authority to relocate communities, build new housing with public funds, designate areas to be abandoned, and establish new locations for populations.

EO 11005: allows the government to take over railroads, inland waterways and public storage facilities.

EO 11051: specifies the responsibility of the Office of Emergency Planning and gives authorization to put all Executive Orders into effect in times of increased international tensions and economic or financial crisis.

EO 11310: grants authority to the Department of Justice to enforce the plans set out in Executive Orders, to institute industrial support, to establish judicial and legislative liaison, to control all aliens, to operate penal and correctional institutions, and to advise and assist the President.

That is quite a list compiled by too many sources to credit here, so I have set up links directly to US government data bases for you to read them first hand.

EO 11049: assigns emergency preparedness function to federal departments and agencies. All together EO 11049 organized and codified 21 Executive Orders, including those above, and 2 Defense Mobilization Orders: VI-2, 1-12. These EOs & DMOs began to accumulate in 1951. This order made them one law.

EO 11049 stated that this was for use in a national emergency, but never defined what that was. At that time everyone thought that it was about nuclear war, but we have seen that FEMA gets involved in much more than that.

EO 11921: allows the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency to develop plans to establish control over the mechanisms of production and distribution, of energy sources, wages, salaries, credit and the flow of money in U.S. financial institution in any undefined national emergency. It also provides that when a state of emergency is declared by the President, Congress cannot review the action for six months. The Federal Emergency Management Agency has broad powers in every aspect of the nation.

EO 11921: simply tightened the grips on the nation, if ever used fully.

To date, U.S. courts have overturned only two executive orders: the Truman order (integrating the armed services) and a 1996 order issued by President Clinton that attempted to prevent the US government from contracting with organizations that had strike-breakers on the payroll. Congress may overturn an executive order by passing legislation in conflict with it or by refusing to approve funding to enforce it. In the former, the president retains the power to veto such a decision; however, the Congress may override a veto with a two-thirds majority to end an executive order. It has been argued that a Congressional override of an executive order is a nearly impossible event due to the super-majority required and the fact that such a vote leaves individual lawmakers very vulnerable to political criticism. (From Wikipedia)

In theory, the President could issue executive orders such as placing decenting legislators under house arrest, or simply nullifying their votes through political pressure.

As you can see there is much more to FEMA than meets the eyes.  I have made no conjectures or statements that you can not verify by reading the original documents.

Next time: What does all of this mean to you and me today?

Be vigilant,

Chuck


Copyright Crickard Publishing 2009. All rights Reserved

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Bush Haters are Set to Elect a Marxist President! At Least the Market Thinks So.

I have been sifting through the growing pile of ashes of the maelstrom that is building and threatening to raze our country.

It appears that Senator Obama will most likely be our next president, and most likely the Bush Haters will elect him.  He has been campaigning specifically toward them, trying to make Senator McCain a Bush clone.  McCain’s voting record has not been much different than most in the senate, and is not necessarily wrong; however, he is not George Bush.

Look at how the market feels!

The fundamentals of the sub-prime debacle on the market drove it down to a DJIA of 9500, but the movements after that had nothing to do with any basics or economic fundamentals.  A free market will correct itself and maintain a calm society. 

The lending by mortgage companies and banks to unqualified borrowers and the purchasing of these acid assets by Fannie and Freddie mandated (forced) by the Democrats in the 1990’s and beyond, led to the beginning of the collapse, not “de-regulation” as they have been shouting (outright lying), but there is a lot more heinous things going on under the surface.

As I have said before, the fall below 9500 was greatly enhanced by the fear merchants in the media and the Obama campaign (and some Republicans, everlasting shame on them all).

Why the continued crumbling of stock values?  It should make no sense whatsoever.  Almost a 1000 major stocks were at that point selling below their cash-held value.  (i.e., if a company has $1000 in cash and a 100 shares, its cash-held value are $10, if it is bid at $8, this is a steal). 

The Dow hit the area of 8500 three times and broke through on Friday meaning cash rich companies should be immediate targets, but there are no buyers.  Remember, the market seldom reacts, it mostly anticipates.  Why does it fear now?  I believe it is obvious, the end of the free market; the election of Senator Obama as the first Marxist president. 

I DO NOT make this statement lightly or in jest.  The Senator said himself he wanted to “spread the wealth”.  He refuses to elucidate his actual stands on anything.  He just wants change!   He has never taken stands as his votes have indicated.  He voted almost entirely “here” or “present” on every occasion.

Even Joe Biden has qualms.  I think Senator Biden is a fool but basically an honest man.  He stated during the primaries that Senator Obama was inexperienced and would not have time to “learn on the job”.  He has recently reaffirmed that opinion by stating that his lack of knowledge would cause an attack or other major situation within 6 months of him taking office.

This past weekend when Reporter Barbara West of WFTV in Orlando, FL posed this very question of a Marxist presidency and Biden reacted very uncharacteristically.  Instead of laughing it off, or simply stating a contrary view, he had a major horrendous fit.  This is a very telling reaction of what Biden knows deep down inside and echoes even his most dreaded fears.  The Obama campaign has since banned the station from any contact with it.

As I write this, the market appears to be continuing its plunge.  If it goes below 7500, we can kiss our standard of living good-bye.  Pension funds, bank accounts, and the wealth of the nation (and the world) are at risk as it has not been in a long while.

I said in my last article don’t fear, it will correct itself; and it will, if the market is left to be free.  But if a socialist agenda is taken by a President Obama and the equally socialist leaders of the house and senate, forget it.

The current bail-out actions have already reduced the future buying power of the dollar to about 80 cents.   Read the news, companies are either laying off workers in advance of this happening or already have.  Even the media is announcing cut-backs and of all things renewing or extending low rated shows instead of buying new pilots, because it saves money.

I sincerely hope that I am 100% wrong.  Only time will tell, but I am as certain as I can be this is our future.  When the election is over, we will all know. 

Senator McCain has his problems undoubtedly, not the least of which is his own liberal tendencies; however, I don’t think he will try to destroy our free-market system.

God help us all,

Chuck

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac: An Unholy Brew

Even I was confused on this one.Talk about intricate conniving on a grand scale.

The federal government itself took over Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac directly, probably so the Fed would not get its hands dirty.The corruption and incompetence of the officers of these two mortgage companies should make them follow the Enron boys to prison; but it will never happen.The worst possible outcome for them might be that their “golden parachutes” (separation payments) may be deflated.

How can this be? It is simple: friends in high places, and money.Why do you think Senators Obama & McCain don’t want to discuss this hot topic?Remember if you are not part of the solution, you part of the problem.

The main big friend is Congressman Barney Frank: “Fannie Mae’s Patron Saint, WSJ 9/9/08.He his almost single handedly stopped any regulation of these yahoos since 2000.Why?Maybe it’s this: “But the biggest payoff for Mr. Frank is the "affordable housing" trust fund he managed to push through as one political price for the recent Fannie reform bill. This fund siphons off a portion of Fannie and Freddie profits -- as much as $500 million a year each -- to a fund that politicians can then disburse to their favorite special interests.”

Don’t think Rep. Frank is the only one to blame.A whole bunch of the senate, congress, bureaucrats, and even Cabinet level types are involved.And if you Bush haters what to sound off on this one, go ahead.He has stated over and over that this is the wrong approach, but agreed to it anyway.

Take a look at these three points:

1.The government’s main point man is Treasury Sec. Paulson.Where do presidents usually get their people for this job: in the financial arena of course.Democrat and Republican Presidents both do it.It’s not a party thing.If you think about it, it’s like asking the fox to guard the eggs in the henhouse.Good bye eggs!

2.The companies involved, though semi-half heartedly regulated by the government, are all financial community members.They can run things pretty much as the wish and they did.

3.Since the government has no money of their own, they have two places to get it: steal more from us directly (this is usually unpalatable) or borrow it.The lender is almost always the Federal Reserve System because no one in their right mind would lend them a cent.The Fed (a private company composed of banks; i.e. the financial sector) will create some and lend it, at a reasonable rate, to the government.

Are you getting the picture here?At all points of this unholy triumvirate are all of the same people.They swirl their magic swizzle sticks in this devils brew and out pops several things:a massive debt we have to pay, an addition to our national debt the size of 5 Iraqi wars, a kick in the butt for more inflation (especially since they promise to lower the Fed Rate instead of raise it), and a huge payout to their friends.

They make a big deal out of stating the stockholders would lose their interest first.When all of the former loans come due, that won’t be a drop in the bucket.

Sure their going to let Lehman Bros. crap out, there’s not as much money to be made there, and they can’t scam us on everything.We might get wise.There’s a fat chance of that.

Oh, look out there on the horizon.What is it?Nothing really, just the major airlines and all three auto companies (GM, Ford, & Chrysler) wanting their bail-out too.

Maybe we should just bend over and kiss our ------ good-bye.


Copyright Crickard Publishing 2008. All rights Reserved
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »