About Me

Name: Chuck Rickard
Location: Baltimore, MD
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

FEMA: Friend, Foe, or Tyrannical Tool! Part 3, The End?

As you saw in my first article, FEMA is not what it appears to be. This can be said with most rules, regulations, and laws that come out of Washington (and most state capitals). Human greed and the quest for power are endless.

I first learned of this in the late seventies and called Maryland Senator Paul Sarbanes’ office for copies of all the pertinent Executive Orders. After a few weeks they provided everything.  It didn’t take long to see what was behind all of this preparedness.

I don’t know if the Presidents involved completely understood the implications. I doubt it or they may never have signed off on them. Some staffers probably worked on it and they just signed it thinking they were doing the right thing. Maybe no one did it intentionally. That we will never know.

However, the point of fact is, it is a dangerous and tyrannically system if used by the wrong person(s).

This and other bits and pieces of knowledge that I accumulated over the years led me to believe there would be a time when we had the chance of a drastic change in our government, and FEMA might just led the way. I figured it might be in the nineties but it didn’t happen.

Ronald Reagan was too much of a patriot and had little time or energy for a power grab. George Bush I, though a liar and fairly incompetent, was the same. Bill Clinton was just a social guy looking for a good time, a name in history, and the percs of office. No matter what you think of him, George Bush II was a patriot without the ambition of power.

When Alexander Haig was a well known name, I had my fears he would be the one. He tried to take over the government when Reagan was shot, though he had no legal right to do so. It was rumored that the explosion in his NATO caravan was just a ploy to get his name in the news. Who knows? Regardless, thankfully he faded into to history and never became a serious candidate for President.

In addition to the Orders I listed and the rulings of the Supreme Court, something extremely disturbing happened in 2007. That was the basic repeal of the Posse Comitatus Act.

“The Posse Comitatus Act is a United States federal law (18 U.S.C. § 1385) passed on June 16, 1878 after the end of Reconstruction, with the intention (in concert with the Insurrection Act of 1807) of substantially limiting the powers of the federal government to use the military for law enforcement. The Act prohibits most members of the federal uniformed services (today the Army, Air Force, and State National Guard forces when such are called into federal service) from exercising nominally state law enforcement, police, or peace officer powers that maintain "law and order" on non-federal property (states and their counties and municipal divisions) within the United States.

The statute generally prohibits federal military personnel and units of the National Guard under federal authority from acting in a law enforcement capacity within the United States, except where expressly authorized by the Constitution or Congress. The Coast Guard is exempt from the Act.” (Wikipedia)

Public Law 109-364, the "John Warner Defense Authorization Act of 2007" (H.R.5122) basically overrides Posse Comitatus and allows use of the military inside the borders of the U.S. One section has a very dire and foreboding change. “(It) specifies situations in which the President can invoke martial law (natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health emergency, terrorist attack or incident or other condition in which the President determines that domestic violence has occurred to the extent that state officials cannot maintain public order). These had not been specified before.” (BORDC) You can read all of the highlights at Bill of Rights Defense Committee's Report.

With the ability to declare martial law combined with the FEMA Orders, we have the absolute possibility of an unstable and uncertain future with the right person at the helm.

Next Time in Part III, I will discuss what is happening now.

As always, be prepared,

Chuck



Copyright Crickard Publishing 2009. All rights Reserved

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

FEMA: Friend, Foe, or Tyrannical Tool! Part 2

As you saw in my first article, FEMA is not what it appears to be. This can be said with most rules, regulations, and laws that come out of Washington (and most state capitals). Human greed and the quest for power are endless.

I first learned of this in the late seventies and called Maryland Senator Paul Sarbanes’ office for copies of all the pertinent Executive Orders. After a few weeks they provided everything.  It didn’t take long to see what was behind all of this preparedness.

I don’t know if the Presidents involved completely understood the implications. I doubt it or they may never have signed off on them. Some staffers probably worked on it and they just signed it thinking they were doing the right thing. Maybe no one did it intentionally. That we will never know.

However, the point of fact is, it is a dangerous and tyrannically system if used by the wrong person(s).

This and other bits and pieces of knowledge that I accumulated over the years led me to believe there would be a time when we had the chance of a drastic change in our government, and FEMA might just led the way. I figured it might be in the nineties but it didn’t happen.

Ronald Reagan was too much of a patriot and had little time or energy for a power grab. George Bush I, though a liar and fairly incompetent, was the same. Bill Clinton was just a social guy looking for a good time, a name in history, and the percs of office. No matter what you think of him, George Bush II was a patriot without the ambition of power.

When Alexander Haig was a well known name, I had my fears he would be the one. He tried to take over the government when Reagan was shot, though he had no legal right to do so. It was rumored that the explosion in his NATO caravan was just a ploy to get his name in the news. Who knows? Regardless, thankfully he faded into to history and never became a serious candidate for President.

In addition to the Orders I listed and the rulings of the Supreme Court, something extremely disturbing happened in 2007. That was the basic repeal of the Posse Comitatus Act.

“The Posse Comitatus Act is a United States federal law (18 U.S.C. § 1385) passed on June 16, 1878 after the end of Reconstruction, with the intention (in concert with the Insurrection Act of 1807) of substantially limiting the powers of the federal government to use the military for law enforcement. The Act prohibits most members of the federal uniformed services (today the Army, Air Force, and State National Guard forces when such are called into federal service) from exercising nominally state law enforcement, police, or peace officer powers that maintain "law and order" on non-federal property (states and their counties and municipal divisions) within the United States.

The statute generally prohibits federal military personnel and units of the National Guard under federal authority from acting in a law enforcement capacity within the United States, except where expressly authorized by the Constitution or Congress. The Coast Guard is exempt from the Act.” (Wikipedia)

Public Law 109-364, the "John Warner Defense Authorization Act of 2007" (H.R.5122) basically overrides Posse Comitatus and allows use of the military inside the borders of the U.S. One section has a very dire and foreboding change. “(It) specifies situations in which the President can invoke martial law (natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health emergency, terrorist attack or incident or other condition in which the President determines that domestic violence has occurred to the extent that state officials cannot maintain public order). These had not been specified before.” (BORDC) You can read all of the highlights at Bill of Rights Defense Committee's Report.

With the ability to declare martial law combined with the FEMA Orders, we have the absolute possibility of an unstable and uncertain future with the right person at the helm.

Next Time in Part III, I will discuss what is happening now.

As always, be prepared,

Chuck



Copyright Crickard Publishing 2009. All rights Reserved

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

FEMA: Friend, Foe, or Tyrannical Tool! Part 1

It would seem natural that all governments would want to protect their people in times of disaster, both natural and man-made (though not all do). Contingencies may be set up for such events. The United States is no exception. But as with all good intentions the pathway to oblivion is only a short change of course.

Very few citizens had ever heard of FEMA before hurricanes Andrew & Katrina, most have no idea of its origin, abilities, and true purpose. I will set a lot of it out for you in these articles, but you must follow the links and read the official government documents for yourself.

This is not to add to your fear but to your preparedness. As with most things governmental, citizen vigilance is absolutely necessary.

For clarification: An executive order is a proclamation by the President of the United States without the input or action of the congress or senate. It is the law.

It all started simply enough in 1962 with Executive Order EO 10990 ostensibly to re-establish the National Safety Council: true purpose, to take over all modes of transportation and control of highways and seaport in case of an emergency.

That was followed by these:

EO 10995: allows the government to seize and control the communication media.

EO 10997: allows the government to take over all electrical power, gas, petroleum, fuels and minerals.

EO 10998: allows the government to take over all food resources and farms.

EO 11000: allows the government to mobilize civilians into work brigades under government supervision.

EO 11001: allows the government to take over all health, education and welfare functions.

EO 11002: designates the Postmaster General to operate a national registration of all persons.

EO 11003: allows the government to take over all airports and aircraft, including commercial aircraft.

EO 11004: allows the Housing and Finance Authority to relocate communities, build new housing with public funds, designate areas to be abandoned, and establish new locations for populations.

EO 11005: allows the government to take over railroads, inland waterways and public storage facilities.

EO 11051: specifies the responsibility of the Office of Emergency Planning and gives authorization to put all Executive Orders into effect in times of increased international tensions and economic or financial crisis.

EO 11310: grants authority to the Department of Justice to enforce the plans set out in Executive Orders, to institute industrial support, to establish judicial and legislative liaison, to control all aliens, to operate penal and correctional institutions, and to advise and assist the President.

That is quite a list compiled by too many sources to credit here, so I have set up links directly to US government data bases for you to read them first hand.

EO 11049: assigns emergency preparedness function to federal departments and agencies. All together EO 11049 organized and codified 21 Executive Orders, including those above, and 2 Defense Mobilization Orders: VI-2, 1-12. These EOs & DMOs began to accumulate in 1951. This order made them one law.

EO 11049 stated that this was for use in a national emergency, but never defined what that was. At that time everyone thought that it was about nuclear war, but we have seen that FEMA gets involved in much more than that.

EO 11921: allows the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency to develop plans to establish control over the mechanisms of production and distribution, of energy sources, wages, salaries, credit and the flow of money in U.S. financial institution in any undefined national emergency. It also provides that when a state of emergency is declared by the President, Congress cannot review the action for six months. The Federal Emergency Management Agency has broad powers in every aspect of the nation.

EO 11921: simply tightened the grips on the nation, if ever used fully.

To date, U.S. courts have overturned only two executive orders: the Truman order (integrating the armed services) and a 1996 order issued by President Clinton that attempted to prevent the US government from contracting with organizations that had strike-breakers on the payroll. Congress may overturn an executive order by passing legislation in conflict with it or by refusing to approve funding to enforce it. In the former, the president retains the power to veto such a decision; however, the Congress may override a veto with a two-thirds majority to end an executive order. It has been argued that a Congressional override of an executive order is a nearly impossible event due to the super-majority required and the fact that such a vote leaves individual lawmakers very vulnerable to political criticism. (From Wikipedia)

In theory, the President could issue executive orders such as placing decenting legislators under house arrest, or simply nullifying their votes through political pressure.

As you can see there is much more to FEMA than meets the eyes.  I have made no conjectures or statements that you can not verify by reading the original documents.

Next time: What does all of this mean to you and me today?

Be vigilant,

Chuck


Copyright Crickard Publishing 2009. All rights Reserved

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Bush Haters are Set to Elect a Marxist President! At Least the Market Thinks So.

I have been sifting through the growing pile of ashes of the maelstrom that is building and threatening to raze our country.

It appears that Senator Obama will most likely be our next president, and most likely the Bush Haters will elect him.  He has been campaigning specifically toward them, trying to make Senator McCain a Bush clone.  McCain’s voting record has not been much different than most in the senate, and is not necessarily wrong; however, he is not George Bush.

Look at how the market feels!

The fundamentals of the sub-prime debacle on the market drove it down to a DJIA of 9500, but the movements after that had nothing to do with any basics or economic fundamentals.  A free market will correct itself and maintain a calm society. 

The lending by mortgage companies and banks to unqualified borrowers and the purchasing of these acid assets by Fannie and Freddie mandated (forced) by the Democrats in the 1990’s and beyond, led to the beginning of the collapse, not “de-regulation” as they have been shouting (outright lying), but there is a lot more heinous things going on under the surface.

As I have said before, the fall below 9500 was greatly enhanced by the fear merchants in the media and the Obama campaign (and some Republicans, everlasting shame on them all).

Why the continued crumbling of stock values?  It should make no sense whatsoever.  Almost a 1000 major stocks were at that point selling below their cash-held value.  (i.e., if a company has $1000 in cash and a 100 shares, its cash-held value are $10, if it is bid at $8, this is a steal). 

The Dow hit the area of 8500 three times and broke through on Friday meaning cash rich companies should be immediate targets, but there are no buyers.  Remember, the market seldom reacts, it mostly anticipates.  Why does it fear now?  I believe it is obvious, the end of the free market; the election of Senator Obama as the first Marxist president. 

I DO NOT make this statement lightly or in jest.  The Senator said himself he wanted to “spread the wealth”.  He refuses to elucidate his actual stands on anything.  He just wants change!   He has never taken stands as his votes have indicated.  He voted almost entirely “here” or “present” on every occasion.

Even Joe Biden has qualms.  I think Senator Biden is a fool but basically an honest man.  He stated during the primaries that Senator Obama was inexperienced and would not have time to “learn on the job”.  He has recently reaffirmed that opinion by stating that his lack of knowledge would cause an attack or other major situation within 6 months of him taking office.

This past weekend when Reporter Barbara West of WFTV in Orlando, FL posed this very question of a Marxist presidency and Biden reacted very uncharacteristically.  Instead of laughing it off, or simply stating a contrary view, he had a major horrendous fit.  This is a very telling reaction of what Biden knows deep down inside and echoes even his most dreaded fears.  The Obama campaign has since banned the station from any contact with it.

As I write this, the market appears to be continuing its plunge.  If it goes below 7500, we can kiss our standard of living good-bye.  Pension funds, bank accounts, and the wealth of the nation (and the world) are at risk as it has not been in a long while.

I said in my last article don’t fear, it will correct itself; and it will, if the market is left to be free.  But if a socialist agenda is taken by a President Obama and the equally socialist leaders of the house and senate, forget it.

The current bail-out actions have already reduced the future buying power of the dollar to about 80 cents.   Read the news, companies are either laying off workers in advance of this happening or already have.  Even the media is announcing cut-backs and of all things renewing or extending low rated shows instead of buying new pilots, because it saves money.

I sincerely hope that I am 100% wrong.  Only time will tell, but I am as certain as I can be this is our future.  When the election is over, we will all know. 

Senator McCain has his problems undoubtedly, not the least of which is his own liberal tendencies; however, I don’t think he will try to destroy our free-market system.

God help us all,

Chuck

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Is Hugo Chavez Running Washington?

We're screwed. Do you get it yet? The line between the public and private sector was just indelibly blurred. Just as Chavez has been nationalizing the private sector in Venezuela, and Rep. Maxine Waters proposed for the oil industry, the government is now in the financial business up to its collective necks.  Who knows, maybe the oil companies will be next.

Read this carefully: They have just sold our great-grandchildren's birthrights.

Just as I've said before many times, the government has no business being in anything other than the military protection business; certainly not in the market speculation game.  Interestingly enough they blame speculators and short sellers, LOL.  Understand this: most of the markets are made up of... ta-dah... us, our savings, pensions, etc.  and they will work if not messed with by crooks in and out of government.

Add it up: $200+ Billion for Fannie & Freddie (with no guarantees), $80+ Billion for AIG (with 79.9% ownership), $700 Billion (and probably hundreds of billions more) for a new version of Ponzi Scheme called the National Resolution Trust. I believe it might be made a cabinet level department. I really hope they are not that addled.

As I wrote last week, we will be bailing out the Big Three automakers, and next the Airlines. Why not, they're in trouble too? We're all in trouble; send each of us a $100,000 bailout. BTW, that is a proposal (though not that much money) from the Obama camp, which shows their total ignorance of economics.

Where did they get all of this money, suddenly........? They didn't. The Fed (again a private company made up of bankers with superhuman powers) can create money out of nothing and lend it to the government (at a small interest rate). And then the government can give it back to them to do all of this mischief. Sounds a lot like money laundering, doesn't it?

Just the known totals above will add an immediate 8% to the national debt, and all of that money creation will inevitably fuel a huge round of inflation.  Today that dollar bill you had in your pocket yesterday is worth 92 cents.

Why did they do it? Very simply, it is to bail out all of their crooked friends in those arenas that destroyed the companies involved and made off with untold fortunes. As I said before: Fed - Financiers - Government (Paulson & cohorts), the unholy triumvirate.

Why hasn't anyone tried to stop them before? They were paid billions of dollars to look the other way, that's why. Most of capital hill got a cut, some more than others.

Why haven't the candidates said much, because in one way or another they are an intricate part of the problem. In less than three years Sen. Obama became the 2nd largest recipient of the largess and has two of the Fannie & Freddie boys on his staff. Sen. McCain brags of his attempts to stop this years ago, but they were impotent and futile. They should both resign from the race and have another primary.

Sect. Paulson should be fired and possibly indicted for conflict of interest, and the leaders of both parties in the Senate and Congress should be impeached, along with the President: and Pres. Clinton and his cohorts should be indicted as well for their hand in this.

Mark my words, after the euphoria of this drug injection into the market has worn off and the DT's set in, watch out! There might not be a bottom to it all.

The remarkable arrogance of it all is that they have the gall to say, "We had to do it to save the economy and the well-being of the average citizen." That is 100%, unadulterated BS. They have just set into motion the American Financial "End Times", even if it takes years to reach fruition.

I sincerely hope I am wrong, and I will gladly eat the paper on which this was originally written if it is. I DO NOT want to be correct here.

Buy Gold and do your stretching exercises so you can bend over and kisses your butts good-bye.

Chuck Rickard

Copyright 2008 Cerickard Publishing All Rights Reserved
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »